Our research is primarily at the policy and strategic level: how can humanitarian action be made more effective?
HERE-Geneva has conducted, or is in the process of conducting, the following self-initiated projects:
The biggest gaps in humanitarian response exist in situations of armed conflict and political violence. Delivery of humanitarian response in these situations can be highly politicised, is often hindered by insecurity or restrictions on access and is hampered by insufficient operational capacities on the ground. Against such challenging background, this study aims to provide evidence on organisational decision-making process and how they impact effective aid delivery on the ground. The Study is carried out from a neutral perspective, and it does therefore not intend to answer the normative question of “which type of ‘mandate’ is best”, but rather to clarify what differences there are between organisations in terms of how they set priorities and come to strategic choices, and what the advantages and disadvantages of different ‘mandates’ are. In doing so, the research has two main goals:
- To enable humanitarian organisations (and other stakeholders) to understand the implications of different priority settings and strategic choices for their capacity to work in armed conflict
- To shed light on how differences in priority setting and strategic choices between organisations can be successfully combined to foster effective humanitarian action on the ground, in situations of armed conflict.
This analysis will benefit operational organisations as well as donors, as it will improve the understanding of the different approaches and their implications and suggest ways forward on how to build on such differences for a more effective humanitarian system. Nine organisations representing both multi and single mandate organisations are participating in the study, which is currently in its implementation phase.
Project working documents
Priorities and Commitments in Humanitarian Action
In recent years, the humanitarian agenda has become extremely broad with the addition of many different priorities. As a result, there is confusion and misunderstanding on what humanitarian action encompasses and tries to achieve. In response to these issues, HERE-Geneva has over 2015 and in early 2016 engaged a project looking at humanitarian priorities. The focus has been on humanitarian action in armed conflict and the gaps in response found there.
The objective of this project was to provide purpose and direction to the increasingly broad agenda of humanitarian action, formulating key messages on:
• The goal of humanitarian action
• Existing commitments under international law
• Benchmarks for performance
Three sets of issues have been examined in detail:
• Shared values and principles that underpin humanitarian action
• Protection of people affected by armed conflict and the gaps in compliance with international humanitarian law
• The lack of leadership and accountability for performance (resulting in substandard humanitarian performance)
The project, which concluded with the launch of the Final Report in May 2016, also looked at commitments against which actors can be held accountable.